Hamlets Tragic Flaw Essay - 692 Words

Hamlet#8217;s Tragic Flaw It is better not to put off till tomorrow what you can do today. Many consequences can arise when one procrastinates. An example of this is found in Shakespeare#8217;s Hamlet through the depiction of the central character. Although Hamlet is characterized as daring, brave, loyal, and intelligent, he is overwhelmed by his own conscience. The tragic hero is defined as one whose downfall is brought about due to their tragic flaw. Hamlet#8217;s inability to act on his father#8217;s murder, his mother#8217;s marriage, and his uncle assuming of the thrown are all evidence of his tragic flaw of procrastination. #8220;Revenge his foul and most unnatural murder#8221; demands the ghost in (Act I, Scene†¦show more content†¦While Hamlet is suppressing his feelings, he becomes more enraged at their attempts to calm him. Gertrude is also aware of Hamlet#8217;s feelings for Ophelia and uses this as an excuse for Hamlet#8217;s actions. Hamlet has ample tim e to confess the cause of his madness. Unfortunately, Hamlet allows his mother to think he is madly in love rather than tell the truth. After Hamlet delivers his play and sees guilt in his uncle, Gertrude sends for Hamlet. Instead of doing physical damage to his mother, he insist on her confession. If not for Hamlet#8217;s procrastination, her confession could have taken place earlier in the play. This could save him from a great deal of pain and leave his thoughts for other problems. Hamlet#8217;s biggest obstacle in avenging his father#8217;s murder is Claudius being crowned king. With Claudius being in such a powerful position, Hamlet has to be cautious in his actions. Hamlet not only has to kill his father#8217;s murderer, but the king as well. The church was against the wedding from the start and would side with Hamlet. Instead of Hamlet denouncing his mother#8217;s wedding and the crowning of his uncle, he is silent. During the play, Claudius shouts Give me some lig ht. Away and Hamlet was sure of his uncle#8217;s guilt (Act III, Scene 2, Line 152). This was the perfect time for Hamlet to face Claudius. The king was in a venerable state and could have been easily dethroned.Show MoreRelatedHamlet As A Tragic Flaws1515 Words   |  7 Pagesliterary characters have flaws of some kind as this gives them a three dimensional quality. However, in the case of fatally flawed characters, these flaws are so deeply formed that they are doomed to failure and demise. In William Shakespeare s Hamlet, a tragedy, the majority of the characters are doomed or flawed in some way that ultimately results in their failure. Through his portrayal of several secondary characters, Shakespeare proves that all humans possess a tragic flaw in their nature whichRead MoreHamlet Tragic Flaw Analysis1522 Words   |  7 PagesWilliam Shakespeare’s Hamlet is considered one of the greatest tragedies ever written, and it has sparked a few controversial discussions amongs t critics, the most intriguing topic being Hamlet’s ‘tragic flaw’. It was A.C. Bradley who popularised this concept of a ‘tragic flaw’ which was translated and based around Aristotle’s model of tragedy. He suggests that the reason Hamlet delayed the act of avenging his father’s murder was due to possessing a tragic flaw; the inability to act. Whereas, criticRead MoreThe Tragic Flaw of Hamlet Essay792 Words   |  4 PagesThe Tragic Flaw of Hamlet One of the greatest works in literature, Shakespeares Hamlet has been the topic of controversial discussion ever since it was written. The controversies range from Is Hamlet truly mad, to Is Hamlet really in love with Ophelia. The most intriguing topic of discussion though, is Hamlets fatal flaw. As in all Shakespearean works, there is always a tragic hero. This hero is always the person that the audience comes to love, however every tragic hero has to haveRead MoreThe Tragic Flaw Of Oedipus And Hamlet1829 Words   |  8 PagesThe tragic flaw of a human being is usually checked with the method he or she reacts with to the circumstances that life throws upon him or her. Contemporary society appears to be fixated on giving gatherings of people cases of such individuals who, in spite of the affliction of their lives, that still transcend. In fact, maybe nobody is more fit for indicating triumph over struggles than Sophocles and William Shakespeare. In both Oedipus and Hamlet, for example, the primary characters struggle withRead MoreThe Tragic Flaw Of Hamlet By William Shakespeare774 Words   |  4 PagesA tragic flaw is a deficiency in a person that brings them sorrow and misery. A high percentage of individuals have some type of tragic flaw that earns them misery, wether it be a relatively small issue like being a tad l azy, or something bigger like showing open contempt for others. Both these flaws are a detriment to individuals and will hinder them in their lives. In the play, Hamlet there are a number of characters that have tragic flaws, including Gertrude and her inability to be loyal andRead MoreThe Tragic Flaw Of Shakespeare s Hamlet1399 Words   |  6 PagesShakespeare’s Hamlet is a moral that rings true today: do not involve others with your own problems. In Hamlet, Shakespeare s utilization of hamartia and tragedy brings the overall moral into light in a dramatized manner. The two are especially prominent near the climax and finale of the play. Hamartia appears first, as it deals with the leading male of the story, and actually aids in the deliverance of tragedy in the final scene of Act V. Hamartia is a literary device Shakespeare uses in Hamlet; the mainRead MoreThe Tragic Flaw Of Shakespeare s Hamlet1734 Words   |  7 PagesJacqueline Borutski ENG4U Mr. Froome April 11, 2016 The Tragic Overuse of Logic in Hamlet Logic is man s most valuable asset; it is what pushed humanity past other species and helped develop humankind into what it is today. Without such logic and reasoning, humanity would not have evolved into the strongest and most powerful beings alive. It is what has enabled us to dominate the world, create civilization, unlock the secrets of the universe through math and science and reveal the true natureRead MoreThe Flaws of the Tragic Hero Hamlet in Shakespeares Hamlet Essay974 Words   |  4 PagesThe Flaws of the Tragic Hero Hamlet in Shakespeares Hamlet With Hamlet being generally labeled as the best tragic hero ever created, it is ironic that his tragic flaw has never been as solidly confirmed as those of most of his fellow protagonists. There is Macbeth with his ambition, Oedipus with his pride, Othello with his jealousy, and all the others with their particular odd spots. Then there is Hamlet. He has been accused of everything and of nothing, and neither seems to stick. Flaws areRead More Hamlets Hesitation as his Tragic Flaw in Hamlet by Shakespeare797 Words   |  4 PagesHamlets Hesitation as his Tragic Flaw in Hamlet by Shakespeare In the play Hamlet, Hamlet is described as daring, brave, loyal, and intelligent. However, he is always consumed by his own thoughts, this being his tragic flaw. There are numerous times Hamlet does not act when he should, like his inability to act on his fathers murder, his mothers marriage, and his uncles assuming of the throne. Revenge his foul and most unnatural murder, says the ghost of Hamlet. The fact that his ownRead MoreHamlet by William Shakespeare648 Words   |  3 PagesTo be, or not to be, or maybe just to pretend to be – Hamlet - make up your mind already! Before discussing Hamlet’s hamartia, please let me say that Hamlet is one of my all-time favorite plays. Yes, it is tragic. Yes, they all fall in the end. But, good lord, what action! So, what is this shortcoming the unfortunate Hamlet possesses that brings about his undeserved end? Before discussing the frailty of this tragic hero, let us examine the word, hamartia, used by Aristotle in â€Å"The Poetics†. Hamartia

Trifles And A Doll House - 969 Words

Women in the early nineteen hundreds were not thought of as important as a man. The role of the woman was to stay home and perform household duties such as, caring for the children and the home. The role of the man was to work and speak for the family. The dramas Trifles and A Doll House, show how two women will commit a crime at all cost and somehow contrast with each other. Trifle is a word which is used to describe something with little importance or value. According to Suzy Clarkson Holstein, â€Å"SUSAN CLASPELL’S ‘TRIFLES’ is a deceptive play: deceptive because, like its title, it seems simple, almost inconsequential. Yet the play represents a profound conflict between two models of perception and behavior† (Holstein 282). In the play Trifles, Mrs. Wright is in the situation of being accused of murdering her husband. Mrs. Hale and Mrs. Peters come upon a dead bird during the investigation and realize Mrs. Wright may be guilty. In the play Mrs. Hale sa ys, â€Å"I wonder how it would seem never to have had any children around. No, Wright wouldn’t like the bird- a thing that sang. She used to sing. He killed that too† (124). Mrs. Hale decides to hide the bird to protect Mrs. Wright, realizing the reason why she may have killed him. Mrs. Hale may have been motivated to commit the crime of hiding evidence because of the way the men belittled the women. In the play the Sheriff says, â€Å"They wonder if she was going to quilt it or just knot it† (73). As stated upon the Sheriff’s commentShow MoreRelatedAnalysis Of The Play Trifles And A Doll House 969 Words   |  4 Pagesdramas â€Å"Trifles† and â€Å"A Doll House†, show how two women will commit a crime at all cost and somehow contrast with each other. Trifle is a word which is used to describe something with little importance or value. According to Suzy Clarkson Holstein, â€Å"SUSAN CLASPELL’S ‘TRIFLES’ is a deceptive play: deceptive because, like its title, it seems simple, almost inconsequential. Yet the play represents a profound conflict between two models of perception and behavior† (Holstein 282). In the play â€Å"Trifles†, MrsRead MoreThe Role Of Women In The Doll House And Trifles1667 Words   |  7 Pagesof as being the weaker sex. It was the women’s job to stay home to cook and raise the children. While these are still prevalent issues, it is also true that things has gotten better for some women in recent years. Works like â€Å"The Doll House† by Henrik Ibsen and â€Å"Trifles† by Susan Glaspell have helped advance the idea of what roles women should play in society. In each play there are strong, female protagonists who, despite being oppressed by the societa l rules against women, learn to rebel and fightRead MoreSusan Glaspell s Trifles And A Doll House 2209 Words   |  9 Pagescharacters of the plays â€Å"Trifles† and â€Å"A Doll House†. Although both pieces are set in different eras, several similarities are evident in each reading. The authors of both plays use gender roles, symbolism, and dramatic realism to tell the story of two females, each faced with different circumstances in a masculine society. A society where women are expected to conform to the demands of men at any cost, even if it means to sacrifice their own freedom. Susan Glaspell’s play â€Å"Trifles† revolves around theRead MoreAnalysis Of Antigone A Doll s House And Trifles 1239 Words   |  5 PagesObedience to Authority Obedience and authority are seen as a priority in the plays† Antigone, A Doll’s House, and Trifles†. In the three plays women disobey men authority following their beliefs. In each play men enforce their authority over women; women are treated as if they were less than men. Antigone a woman with strong beliefs and morals revels against her uncle Creon. In A Doll’s House Nora was treated as pet by her husband Helmer until she opens her eyes. He always refers to her with nicknamesRead MoreChanging The World : One Play At A Time1644 Words   |  7 Pagesduring the birth of feminism are quintessential to the rise of free expression among women. A Doll House by Henrik Ibsen, and Trifles by Susan Glaspell both explore the unjust role of women in society, though in contrast, A Doll House develops the theme through a more complex external conflict. Trifles and A Doll House are both centered on marriage and both come from the woman’s point of view. In Trifles, the audience is introduced into the home of Mrs. Wright, which is being investigated as theRead MoreGlaspell s Trifles And The Invisibility Of Women1490 Words   |  6 PagesGlaspell’s Trifles and the Invisibility of Women Susan Glaspell’s play Trifles and Henrik Ibsen s A Doll s House are plays that explore a number of important features of femininity and life as a woman. Trifles explores a number of thematic ideas surrounding a woman’s place and her propensity for violence. The Author explores a thematic idea that centers on the proper dispensation of justice: Glaspell critically investigates the question of whether an individual can truly receive justice fromRead MoreA Doll s House : Henrik Ibsen962 Words   |  4 PagesDrama Analysis A Doll’s House (Henrik Ibsen) And Trifles (Susan Glaspell) In comparing both dramas, the overwhelming aspect of convergence between both is the open discussion of gender identity. Both dramas make similar points about what it means to be a woman. Modern society in both dramas is constructed with men holding power over women. This is seen in Trifles in how men like George Henderson and Mr. Hale are myopic. The premise of the drama is how women worry over trifles, and the dismissive attitudeRead MoreAnalysis Of The Play A Doll House 919 Words   |  4 Pagesunable to control their actions or thoughts is difficult. Whether it may have been during the 1800s or 1900s, humans experience this unpredictable event. For instance, in the play A Doll House, Nora was a wife who held a deep, darkening secret in which she chose to keep hidden from her husband. During the play entitled Trifles, Mrs. Hale came to the decision to remove evidence from the scene in order to not allow officials of the county to predict what may have actually happened to John W right duringRead MoreTheme Of Marriage In A Dolls House1624 Words   |  7 PagesMarriage is tough. Nora and Torvald Helmer prove that in Henrik Ibsen’s classic play â€Å"A Doll House†. Not only does the main character’s marriage fail because of secrets, but because of the reasoning behind having those secrets. The late 1800’s when the play was published saw more than it’s fair share of sexism but the twist comes with Nora leaving Torvald at the end of the play, which at the time was unheard of. More often than not this play leaves the reader siding with Nora and for a good reasonRead MoreComparison essay -- Trifles and A Dolls House1460 Words   |  6 Pagesï » ¿Desperate Times Call For Desperate Change People are capable of doing crazy things! Nora, in Henrik Ibsen’s A Doll’s House, loved her husband so much that she committed forgery just for the sake of his wellbeing. Susan Glaspell’s character in Trifles, Mrs. Wright, murders her husband after she discovers that he killed the one most precious thing to her, her pet bird. It was out of love that these women committed illegal crimes. Nora wanted her husband to be healthy because she loved him and knew

Yoga Free Essays

Yoga Free Essays Yoga Benefits So this was my first yoga class. In the beginning I Just though yoga Is setting still, but after this class I know how yoga can make all and every muscle working. I took this class because my doctor asked me to do yoga after 2 bad car accidents so I can get the muscle In my back and my nick get stronger. We will write a custom essay sample on Yoga or any similar topic only for you Order Now As well as I need to have that time for me that I can relax and challenge myself, While that Is my favorite thing to do. To ell the truth Kate you are amazing yoga Instructor. The only different I wish I can see Is another class. I wish that you can talk to the dean and make It yoga l, II, Ill. I never enjoy anything Like how I enjoy this class. It I will take yoga again I wish Just more challenge class, but I understand that not everyone was soul able to do down dog that is why I would love yoga Ill. I had so much benefits from the class, first one is I feel my muscle are working I do have a lot of muscles not and I can run more and do ore pushup. Second thing I really relax in class even though not in the relaxing time because I have a monkey brine but during the exercises. Third I was so happy when we did the shark test I kind of never knew that helping people and focusing all the time on the other people cud affect me that bad. Fourth I was really enjoy the time that I had for myself in the class. Yoga class was the only class that I really enjoy being in it and felt sad to miss classes in the semester. One more thing that I got UT of this class is my legs are a lot stronger and that help me while I work for 12 hrs shift standing up Kate you made me love yoga and I am planning to get a membership in GYM just for yoga classes or Just get in hot yoga because I want try it out. Thanks so much for your time and Names! Yoga By narrator So this was my first yoga class. In the beginning I Just though yoga is setting still, but the muscle in my back and my nick get stronger. As well as I need to have that time for me that I can relax and challenge myself, While that is my favorite thing to do. To tell the truth Kate you are amazing yoga instructor. The only different I wish I can see is another class. I wish that you can talk to the dean and make it yoga l, II, Ill. I never enjoy anything like how I enjoy this class. If I will take yoga again I wish Just more challenge class, but I understand that not everyone was still able to do down dog 0 shift standing up Kate you made me love yoga and I am planning to get membership in GYM Just for yoga classes or Just get in hot yoga because I want try it out. How to cite Yoga, Papers

Social Responsibilities of Business-Free-Samples-Myassignmenthelp

Question: Write a Literature Review on the theories available in relation to Business Organizations. Answer: Introduction There has been a long debate in relation to the purpose of a business entity. The prima faice purpose of a business organization has always been towards making profits and ensuring that the investors and other shareholders get adequate returns for the investment made by them in relation to the organization (Smith 2003). However various contemporary studies have depicted that the aim of the modern day business is not merely to make profit, organizations also has a major role to pay in relation to the society as it is also one of the major stakeholders of the organizations (Weinstein 2013). This is because of the growing competition between various organizations goodwill has become point of distinction. The management of stakeholders in relation to the operations of an organization is a critical component. According to Sharplin (2003) any person, organization, group or the society who can be affected by or is likely to presume themselves to be affected by a particular operation is know n as a stakeholder. Positive relationships are created through a process of effective stakeholder management. The position can be reached by an appropriate management process with respect to the agreed objectives and expectations of the stakeholders. One of the pillars of proper stakeholder management is the carrying out of operations of a business organization based on the principles of ethics. Ethical principles have to be incorporated into the functioning of organization to ensure that the organization is able to make profit as well as ensure that the goodwill of the organization among its stakeholders is maintained. However an organization cannot function solely based on ethics as it is the one of the major functions of the organization to make profit and give proper returns to the stakeholders. The thesis statement of this essay is that the businesses can only function properly if it aims to make profit through the incorporation of ethics in its operations. The paper conducts a literature review on the various theories available in relation to business organizations and provide how the broader view provided by the thesis can benefit the society. The paper also discusses the approach in light of other theories. Literature review According to Friedman (1970), (2007) "social responsibilities of business in a free-enterprise, is huge. He is of a view that the business entities must base their operations under ethical considerations. There are several functions which business entities can serve is relation to the society through basing their operations on the principles of ethics. These functions include providing employment, eliminating discrimination, restricting population and other forms of reforms in relation to the society. However according to the article businessmen have become puppets of intellectual forces which is restricting the fundamentals of free society. A corporation is an artificial person and not a real person however this fact is not enough to come to a conclusion that business entities have no responsibility. The doctrine of social responsibility is further used to clarify the statement. The corporations although is an artificial legal person it comprises if natural people who run its operations. A corporate executive is a worker of the business in a private property system free enterprise. Such workers have direct responsibilities in relation to the employer which means the corporation. The responsibility provides that the business has to be conducted by the employees according to the demands of the employer (Sharplin 2003). These desires are primarily with respect to making money while complying with ethical basic provisions incorporated through law and ethical customs. In exceptional cases the employer may have objectives different to what have been stated above. However as provided by Turnbull (1997) corporations are not alw ays incorporated for the purpose of making profit but may also be for a eleemosynary objective. These corporations do not have the objective of making profit but that of rendering specific services effectively. The article states that if the doctrine of social responsibility is to be taken seriously the scope of political mechanisms would cover all human activities (Shah and Bhaskar 2007). According to the article that the only social responsibility of the business organizations is to direct its resources towards making profit as long as it promotes free trade and does not indulge in deception or fraud. Jenson (2002) provides a relationship between stakeholder management and the theory of values of theory maximization which is known as enlightened value maximization. The concept uses the structure of the stakeholder management theory but also accepts the theory in relation to value maximization in relation to the organization in the long run. The businesses cannot strive if the merely focus on one theory. They need to maintain a balance between making profits and managing the stakeholders at the same time. The article also provides that the theory of balanced scorecard which is a managerial equivalent to the theory of stakeholder management have various flaws if not flawed totally. The scorecard provided to the managers by the theories give no score which means that there is no single measure to evaluate how they had performed. Thus in such a system where there is lack of a proper evaluation method the managers do not get the basis of making evident based and purposeful decisions. T he author argues by considering the positive as well as the normative arguments that the firms who are flowing the traditional stakeholders theories are less likely to succeed in competitive market. To the contrary those firs which adopt a single approach of value creation are likely to flourish in such market. The stakeholders theory is only preferred by the managers and executives as it enhances their powers and does not make them accountable. The idea in relation to a stakeholder is has become one of the most significant additions to the contemporary business ethics (Boatright 2006). The issues faced by all groups of stakeholders have become broadly recognized features with respect to ethical management. According to Beauchamp, Bowie and Arnold (2004) while making a decision the managers must consider the interest of all stakeholders. Commonly the lists of stakeholders include customers, creditors, employees, suppliers, shareholders and the society as a whole. There is not much argument against the concept of stakeholders management provided by modern business models. The argument lies in the fact that how to ensure profitability of the business along with the ensuring the interest of other stakeholders. Dobson (1999) provides an argument that stakeholders management acts as a guide for managers rather than a method of corporate governance. The concept provides a useful guidelines to those executives who how all stakehold ers can be benefited from shareholders primacy and use it as a reason for not considering other stakeholders. Such executives themselves make a mistake towards determining how the corporation should be managed and governed. There is no reason which suggests that a manager who is acting in the best interest of the shareholders would not be able to provide benefits to the other stakeholders of the business such as the society Freeman (2007) provides a study in relation to outlining stakeholders management which is an emerging view for business organizations. The concept of stakeholders management is said to have emerged over the last three decades through scholars belonging to a diverse set of disciplines starting from finance to philosophy. The fundamental principles in relation to the concept provide that the businesses along with its managers must have an aim to create value for employees, customers, suppliers, shareholders and the communities. Carefully attention has to be provided to how to create such values and manage the relationships. However the article contrasts the dominant view which is adopted in the business world which provides for managing the organization to benefit the shareholders and all other benefits and harms are created incidentally. The dominant model of business is resistant to change neither is it consistent with law or fundamental ethical principles as stated by Martin (2010). It has been argued by Hansmann and Kraakman (2000) that the dominant model is a good idea because it provides good consequences for all. The arguments in relation to rights provide that all property rights are provided to the shareholders leaving out the rights of the other stakeholders. Ferrell and Fraedrich (2015) has provides one of the strongest argument in favor of stakeholder management by asking the executives what kind of company they want. Thus businesses must operate in a ethical manner to ensure its proper existence Benefit to the society During the past two decades evidence has been provided through empirical studies that corporate social responsibility initiative provides measurable payoffs towards the organization as well as its stakeholders. The organizations have a major role to pay in the society. They have the power to influence the promotion of ethics into the society and seek its overall development. The organizations provide employment to the individual of the society. These individuals work together in the organization towards a common purpose of making profit and other objectives of the organization. How these individual behave in their work place have a significant effect on their behavior outside the workplace. The organizations have significant power to influence the behavior of those who are working for it through the incorporation of ethical principles in its system (Lawrence and Weber 2014). When the organization introduces strict ethical compliance in relation to its workplace the individuals get us e to such behavior and thus ethical behavior is reflected outside the organization in the society. For instance the incorporation of principles regarding bullying and discrimination into the workplace polices would also ensure that the individuals would reflect such polices in the society however there may a certain exceptions. It has been understood for a long period that the motive of a business is only to make profit. Any individual who wants to start a business activity does it solely on the objective of making profit. However when the business grows and evolves into a large organization its objective must become different as provided by the above discussed literatures. According to Carroll and Buchholtz (2014) a business cannot flourish by only acting on the principles of making profit as there is immense competition in the market and a point of distinction which investors and customers seek between the organizations is in relation to their social involvement. The social involvement of the organizations in an ethical manner can do wonders for the society. The organizations have access to large capital which can be used towards the betterment of the society such as increasing measures towards the protection of environment and indulging in community developments activities. For instance an organization w hich is in indulging in the process of production can incorporate efficient technology to prevent pollution which is a serious concern for the modern day society. This would not only ensure a better environment and trigger sustainability but also enhance the reputational capital of the organization. Through restraining from anti-competitive activities by indulging in ethical dealings the organizations can promote ethical compliance in the society as it would lead to a transparent business structure which is free from corruption. The broader view would only benefit the organization in the long run and along with promoting the development of the society would also ensure that they like up to the expectations of their shareholders through making profit (Martin 2010). Justice and normative theory analysis According to the kantanian theory it is unfair to treat people as means of end and individuals of the society has to be treated as ends themselves. Here the means of end refer to any specific actions for the purpose of achieving a particular goal. The theoretical approach which has been provided by Jenson (2002) in relation to organization proposes that the stakeholder management theory is flawed and a mixture of stakeholder management as well as value creation is needed for proper development is not totally consistent with the Kantnian theory. This is because the theory provides to hold people as the ends themselves whereas the approach provides that people may be used to generate profit for the organization as long as their personal development is also ensured. In the same way the resources of the society can be utilized for the purpose of generating profits for the organization (Bowie 2017). According to the theory of duty of care a person whose activities can reasonable cause harm to another person has a duty of care towards such person and where the duty is violated it results in compensation. According to the approach provided by Friedman (1970) where the motive of the organizations is to make profit only, the organization cannot make profit without utilizing the resources of the society and as the organization has vast influence on the society its actions can harm the society as whole. The organization therefore owes a duty of care towards the society and if any harm is caused they are responsible to compensate the society for such losses. As per the theory of Boatright (2006) which argues that the organizations must use a more synthesized approach by merging ethical approaches with the profit making approach the duty of care theory would provide to ensure the development of society as a whole as it still involves using the resources of the society. According to Follesdal (2015) the term justice is used to define the importance of fairness, equality and rights. People would thing that it is unjust when they are not getting proper return on their investments unfairly, having there right of enjoying equality in the society violated and being unfairly treated because of ones protected traits. In his theory Rawls rejects the utilitarian forms of justice and provides that justice is not the same as morality. A new way to have knowledge about the position of justice has been suggested by him. It has been argued by Rawls that economical and social inequalities are not just unless certain requirements are met. Firstly equal opportunities have to be provided and higher inequalities must advantage those least economical and social resources. Thus the utilitiranism approaches provided by Piacquadio (2017) those economic inequalities can be justified where it maximizes happiness is rejected by the justice theory. Here an argument can be pro vided by Rawls in against the approach provided by Follesdal (2015) that distributing disposable income in the profit of many would enhance the economy. Other theories towards reconciling the view The theories in relation to corporate social responsibility (CSR) provide that the operation of the organization has to be based on two pillars. The organization while having the objective of making profits must also ensure that their actions depict ethical interactions with the surrounding community (Lee 2017). The nature of CSR with respect to an organization also provides the conception in relation to making profit while also having its effects on border question related to the welfare of community. There are four obligations which are imposed on an organization through the concept of corporate social responsibility. Firstly the economic responsibility of earning profits ;Secondly, legal responsibility which is in relation to complying with the legal rules and regulation; thirdly ethical responsibilities which is in relation to doing what is right even when it is not required by law and lastly philanthropic responsibility which means to indulge in the projects of the society even when they are not related to the business activities (Carroll and Buchholtz 2014). The theory is totally consistent with the synthesized approach of ethics and profit argued by this paper and proposed by Boatright (2006). Both the theories provide that ethics and profit making must both be incorporated by the organizations in relation to their operations. As per the theory of creating shared values Crane et al. (2014) there is mutual dependence among the competitiveness of an organization and the health of communities around it. Capitalism can be redefined and next wave of global growth can be unleashed by capitalizing and reorganizing these connections among economic and societal progress. The theory of CSV, thus is not consistent with the approached provided by Friedman (1970) and Freeman (2007) and is totally consistent with the synthesized approach proposed by this paper. According to Pauli (2010) economy can be enhanced through the process of creating more jobs, reducing the use of energy and alongside benefiting community development know as blue economy. The concept is also to some extent consistent with the proposed argument of the paper in relation ethical observations but not in relation to making profits. The economy model proposed the creation of enhanced values rather than cutting cost in a blind manner (Svensson and Pend leton 2014). This proposal can be interpreted as making profits while addressing the needs of the society. the theory of circular economy which is an alternative to the traditional theory of linear economy which provides the concept of make use and dispose, provides a view that resources are to be kept as long as possible for the purpose of extracting maximum values while they are in use and then recover and reproduce material and products at the end of every service life (Tukker 2015). The view is consistent with the theoretical approach provided by Boatright (2006) in relation to the incorporation of ethics with respect to operations. Conclusion A business is successful to the extent that it provide a product or service that contributes to the happiness in all of its forms- Mihaly Csikszebtmihalyi. In case the organizations are provided with the motive of making profit only than in the contemporary business world, such organizations would not be able to succeed. This is because there is so much completion and availability of similar technology that the differentiation which the customers seek is with respect to the social indulgence of the organization. In addition an organization would not be able to address the needs of its shareholders and investors if it does not make adequate profits. Thus the synthesized approach is the best possible approach which can be used by the organization towards their operations. Recommendations The organizations must indulge in social projects even when they are not related to the business The organizations must ensure ethical and legal compliance within the workplace to ensure that the individuals working for them are influenced by such principles. Fair completion and fair trading in the market place has to be used by the organizations in relation to its dealings The organizations has to work on the principles of sustainability as it has been provided and proved by various researches that the concept helps in attaining long term goals. References Beauchamp, T.L., Bowie, N.E. and Arnold, D.G. eds., 2004. Ethical theory and business. Boatright, J.R., 2006. Whats wrongand whats rightwith stakeholder management.Journal of Private Enterprise,21(2), pp.106-130. Bowie, N.E., 2017.Business ethics: A Kantian perspective. Cambridge University Press. Carroll, A. and Buchholtz, A., 2014.Business and society: Ethics, sustainability, and stakeholder management. Nelson Education. Carroll, A. and Buchholtz, A., 2014.Business and society: Ethics, sustainability, and stakeholder management. Nelson Education. Chell, E., Spence, L.J., Perrini, F. and Harris, J.D., 2016. Social entrepreneurship and business ethics: does social equal ethical?.Journal of Business Ethics,133(4), pp.619-625. Crane, A., Palazzo, G., Spence, L.J. and Matten, D., 2014. Contesting the value of creating shared value.California management review,56(2), pp.130-153. Davis, J.H., Schoorman, F.D. and Donaldson, L., 1997. Toward a stewardship theory of management.Academy of Management review,22(1), pp.20-47. DesJardins, J.R. and McCall, J.J., 2014.Contemporary issues in business ethics. Cengage Learning. Dobson, J., 1999. Is shareholder wealth maximization immoral?.Financial Analysts Journal, pp.69-75. Ferrell, O.C. and Fraedrich, J., 2015.Business ethics: Ethical decision making cases. Nelson Education. Ferrell, O.C. and Fraedrich, J., 2015.Business ethics: Ethical decision making cases. Nelson Education. Follesdal, A., 2015. John Rawls Theory of Justice as Fairness. InPhilosophy of Justice(pp. 311-328). Springer Netherlands. Freeman, R.E., Harrison, J.S. and Wicks, A.C., 2007.Managing for stakeholders: Survival, reputation, and success. Yale University Press. Friedman, M., 2007. The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits.Corporate ethics and corporate governance, pp.173-178. Hansmann, H. and Kraakman, R., 2000. The end of history for corporate law.Geo. LJ,89, p.439. Jensen, M.C., 2002. Value maximization, stakeholder theory, and the corporate objective function.Business ethics quarterly, pp.235-256. Khalid Ali, K., Ramly, Z. and Lau, T.C., 2014.Business ethics. Oxford University Press. Lawrence, A.T. and Weber, J., 2014.Business and society: Stakeholders, ethics, public policy. Tata McGraw-Hill Education. Lee, P.T., 2017, May. Business and Ethics. InINTERNATIONAL FORUM JOURNAL(Vol. 14, No. 2, pp. 39-54). Martin, R., 2010. The age of customer capitalism.Harvard business review,88(1). Piacquadio, P.G., 2017. A fairness justification of utilitarianism.Econometrica,85(4), pp.1261-1276. Shah, S. and Bhaskar, A.S., 2007. Shareholder View vs Stakeholder View of a Firm: A Review.Paradigm,11(2), pp.67-76. Sharplin, A., 2003. A challenge to shareholder supremacy in the public firm.Business and Society Review,108(2), pp.225-234. Shaw, W.H., 2016.Business ethics: A textbook with cases. Nelson Education. Smith, H.J., 2003. The shareholders vs. stakeholders debate.MIT Sloan Management Review,44(4), pp.85-91. Suliman, A.M., Al-Khatib, H.T. and Thomas, S.E., 2016. Corporate Social Responsibility.Corporate Social Performance: Reflecting on the Past and Investing in the Future, p.15. Svensson, L.E. and Pendleton, L., 2014. Transitioning to a New Blue Economy. Tai, F.M. and Chuang, S.H., 2014. Corporate social responsibility.Ibusiness,6(03), p.117. Tukker, A., 2015. Product services for a resource-efficient and circular economya review.Journal of cleaner production,97, pp.76-91. Turnbull, S., 1997. Corporate governance: Its scope, concerns and theories.Corporate Governance: An International Review,5(4), pp.180-205. Weinstein, O., 2013. The shareholder model of the corporation, between mythology and reality.Accounting, Economics and Law,3(1), pp.43-60. Weiss, J.W., 2014.Business ethics: A stakeholder and issues management approach. Berrett-Koehler Publishers.